x
Find out how Path Interactive can deliver a customized approach to growing your business.
Please tell us about yourself and we'll contact you shortly.

Adgeddon or Ad-Blocker-Palooza – Is This The Next Algorithm Update?

Joe Rega December 22, 2015 Category Uncategorized

stop-ads“Geddon” can be a scary when appended to any word, especially when it’s a word we are all familiar with. This usually is indicative of something about to, or that already already did, go wrong.

Take for example, the most recent development of this, mobilegeddon. Before Google released their mobile-friendly algorithm update on April 21st, 2015 people were scrambling to make their websites mobile-friendly.

The panic caused many site owners to create a mobile version of their site in an effort to avoid any penalty that the search Gods may wreak upon their sites. Unfortunately, some took shortcuts so their sites were not truly responsive; many still did not pass Google’s mobile-friendly test.

Fast forward a few months to yesterday, when a conversation on Twitter took place between Jennifer Slegg and Laura Crest.  This dialogue caught my attention and sparked the thought process for this post:

The conversation started when Jennifer posted a screen shot from Forbes where she was not shown an article because of an ad-blocker that was enabled.

Is This To Be The Next Major Algorithm Update?

Google had been waving warning signs for years of a mobile update with their “mobile first” stance on web design.

Most recently, the search giant has taken a stance against full-pages ads on mobile websites and apps as they are a nuisance to all who encounter them.

With this in mind, Google announced that they will be updating the mobile-friendly test to look for these full page ads. After November 1, 2015, the company stated:

“mobile web pages that show an app install interstitial that hides a significant amount of content on the transition from the search result page will no longer be considered mobile-friendly.”

Sounds simple enough, change the size of the ads and nobody gets hurt. But what does this mean for sites blocking users who are blocking ads?

I understand that there is a revenue stream associated with advertising but can sites really afford to ban users from seeing their content? Wouldn’t that be considered a negative user experience?

Referring back to the conversation above, these two great writers voice their frustration as more sites are practicing this method of blocking content from users who have an ad-blocker enabled.

Will Google pick up on this frustration and take action against this practice?

If you have experienced blocked content because of an ad-blocker that is enabled on your browser, please share your story and frustration with us.

Also, please feel free to share your thoughts on an update regarding blocking content. All theories are welcomed, conspiracy or factual, that allude to a mid-2016 update.

Most Recent

App Store Optimization Tips for SEOs (and Other Digital Marketers)

By Romain Damery, PathInteractive | December 5, 2016

Do you know how to make sure that fantastic app is actually seen? So, you or a client has created […]

Read More

Ad Age Names Path Interactive as #3 Best Place to Work in 2016

By Sarah Fonseca Dryden, PathInteractive | December 2, 2016

Many thanks to all our team members for making Path Interactive Ad Age’s #3 Best Place to Work this year. […]

Read More

Content Marketing 101: How to Set Up Buyer Personas & Create a Content Map

By Emil Mequita, PathInteractive | November 21, 2016

The First Rule of Content Marketing: Know Where the Heck You’re Going The ‘Worldwide Web’ is living up to its global […]

Read More